Re: [SMARTY-DEV] Re: object support (more thoughts)

On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 05:14:21PM -0600, Monte Ohrt wrote: > If we force registration of objects, then you have to access an object like this: > > {$foo->bar} > {foo->bar} > > This means you cannot have an array of objects to access in a section loop, such as: > > {section name=bar loop=$foo} > {$foo[bar]->blah} > {/section} > > If we need to support that, then it would mean objects must be assigned instead of registered. > If they are assigned, then individual control over method access isn't really feasible, > we would have to allow access to all methods exluding private ones. All or none. This also > complicates the syntax, we are almost back to square one {$foo->bar()} > > So decisions: > > 1) register all objects, and can only access directly: > > {$foo->bar} <-- property > {foo->bar p1="foo"} <-- method > > PROS: * syntax kept to a bare minimum > CONS: * not as flexible can't assign arrays of objects > > > 2) assign all objects, and allow access to all methods excluding private ones: > > {$foo->bar} > {$foo.bar->blah} > {$foo[bar].foo->blah} > {foo.bar[foo]->foo p1="foo" p2="bar"} > > PROS: * can assign objects or arrays of objects, more flexible > CONS: * syntax is more complex > * can't control individual method access what about registering (or allowing) methods for specific classes, instead of objects? i think this will be flexible enough and may also work with arrays of arrays of objects etc. > I'm really leaning toward option #1. Is there a practical use for assigning > arrays of objects? > > Monte i lead more to #2, although #1 looks simpler and cleaner. just a thought messju