a perfect illustration of the serious problem with the closed approach (and proof it is perceived as closed)

From: Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:39:54 +0000
Subject: a perfect illustration of the serious problem with the closed approach (and proof it is perceived as closed)
Groups: php.standards 
Request: Send a blank email to standards-+get-42@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi, I just received this message on facebook which clearly illustrates the problem I perceive with the process as it currently is being conducted (named removed, I'm not trying to demonize anyone): **** sent you a message. -------------------- Subject: PHP Standards Hello, I've been following the developments on the PHP Standards list, and just like for you, the way things are handled is somewhat disappointing. I wouldn't mind a solution dropped from above, if it was well thought out and consistent with the way people use PHP; after reading the proposal it seems it's not the case here. I tried to send a constructive comment on part of the proposed spec, but my messages are not getting through. I suppose I have to be specifically white-listed, and it's not very clear to me who to contact and how I could make that happen. Ideas? Thank you for all the work you do for the PHP community. It's refreshing to see someone who makes sense when such issues arise, for a change. Regards, **** -------------------- This person sums up perfectly my thoughts on the subject. Thanks to all who have written me off-list, I have had very limited time, but will reply to all of you. Thanks, Greg

« previous php.standards (#42) next »