Re: revision to the standard that would make me happy

From: Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:26:47 +0000
Subject: Re: revision to the standard that would make me happy
References: 1  Groups: php.standards 
Request: Send a blank email to standards-+get-69@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Jun 30, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Greg Beaver wrote:
The current standard draft says: [snip] A package may also declare sub-packages. Sub-packages may name classes with their own package name: <vendor>\<subpackage_name> or with the parent package name: <vendor>\<package_name> With this revision, it would be possible to split up a package and retain the same class names for newly sub-packages. This would literally erase my primary objection to the standard. The only thing left would be determining how to handle details like underscore handling.
Hi Greg, Sorry for being dense, but could you provide a couple of examples of how this naming would play out as a counter-point (or maybe a follow-on) to the examples in the spec? Thanks, - Nate

« previous php.standards (#69) next »