Re: [PHP4BETA] Re: SESS: objects containing objects *final statement*(?) please read!

On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 10:54:37AM -0500, Stig S. Bakken wrote: > thies@digicol.de wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 09:27:31AM -0600, Andrei Zmievski wrote: > > > > > > Would register_object_serialize_method() use some global table where it > > > registers class name and these methods? > > > > c'mon boys we can do nicer that this? > > > > i really like the sleep()/wakeup() thing - but shouldn't we > > make some standard method names part of the language instead > > of having to register_blabla_() them. i don't see why > > somebody would have to name them different. > > Okay then, I'm a big fan of calling them sleep() and wakeup(), but > chances are someone has a class out there with these method names > already. What about serializeSleep() and unserializeWakeup()? that'll always be a problem - the only way to overcome this would be a change in Zend (make soemthing legal that used to be illegal) like: class bla { sleep { // code to sleep() } wakeup { // wakeup code() } } i can feel how "hell breaks loose" now;-)) > > > BTW: what about not serializing class variables that start > > with a '_' character. the usage should be obvious, right? > > I have exactly the same problem as Andrei with this. What about > variables that start with two '_' characters? :-) same as above - in an ideal world we would do: class bla { var $serialize_me; volatile $dont_serialize; .. } i can hear a Z barking:) as we all seem to agree that the concept is good(tm) we can now: - implement it ourself by taking a *tiny* bit of namespace away from the user. or - try to implement it in zend. comments? > > - Stig > -- Thies C. Arntzen "One Big-Mac, Small Fries and a Coke!" Digital Collections Phone +49 40 235350 Fax +49 40 23535180 Hammerbrookstr. 93 20097 Hamburg / Germany