Re: [PHP4BETA] cvs: /php4/ext/standard array.c

From: Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:18:58 +0000
Subject: Re: [PHP4BETA] cvs: /php4/ext/standard array.c
References: 1  Groups: php.version4 
Request: Send a blank email to php-version4+get-12809@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Sterling Hughes wrote: > I agree that every function with return type 'void' should return NULL either on > success or on failure from non-user errors, however, I think when the user does something wrong (in > the case of array.c most of the return values changed are for invalid types), the program should > whine and bitch in every possible way, including returning false. > > As far as array.c is concerned many of the functions that are prototyped as void (such as rsort > or sort or any of the sort functions actually) return true on success, therefore shouldn't it > make sense that they return false on failure? > > If we decide to change the return value back to NULL on failure, perhaps we should stop the > functions from returning true as well. I don't know.. If the function is void, then it should be 'void', i.e. return NULL. If you return TRUE/FALSE then it's not 'void' anymore, it's 'bool' and the return value indicates success or failure. But that's inconsistent because other functions may return real TRUE/FALSE values that have nothing to do with success/failure. -Andrei * All of the above is my opinion, unless specified otherwise. *

« previous php.version4 (#12809) next »