RE: [PHP4BETA] JSP vs. PHP - Two vs. Three Teir

Does the JPS communicate thru Apache via socket because the JSP we are evaluating uses the HTTP that ships with Tomcat. I knew that there would be some degradation but our inhouse benchmarking shows PHP is slower by almost a 1.25 sec. By the way how do you benchmark we would like to use an industry standard? thanks!michael -----Original Message----- From: rubys@us.ibm.com [mailto:rubys@us.ibm.com] Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 5:28 AM To: Vadim Tkachenko Cc: php4beta@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP4BETA] JSP vs. PHP - Two vs. Three Teir Vadim Tkachenko wrote: >Simple script "Hello Word" - > >PHP4 result - 247.4 req/s (4.0 ms/req) >JSP result - 500.2 req/s (2.0 ms/req) > >PHP4 slower then JSP. If you are serving static content, Apache or IIS is a much better way to go. PHP extensions are hand written in C code, so may run faster than their Java counterparts. In many applications, most of the time is spent in the database. - Sam Ruby -- PHP 4.0 Beta Mailing List <http://www.php.net/version4/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php4beta-unsubscribe@lists.php.net For additional commands, e-mail: php4beta-help@lists.php.net To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php4beta-admin@lists.php.net