Re: [PHP4BETA] Zend vs. Perl benchmarks?
| From: | Monte Ohrt | Date: | Tue, 15 Jun 1999 13:30:05 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PHP4BETA] Zend vs. Perl benchmarks? | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.version4 |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-version4+get-1561@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> At 23:01 14/06/99 , Monte Ohrt wrote:
> >Jim Winstead wrote:
> > >
> > > Didn't there used to be Zend vs. Perl benchmarks on zend.com?
> > >
> > > A potentially big user of PHP just asked about their relative
> > > performance. (Actually, the question was more like "I've heard that
> > > Perl performs WAY better than PHP, is that true?" I tried to
> > > enlighten them, but having a benchmark to point them at (which
> > > they can pass on) might help the cause a bit.)
> > >
> > > Jim
> > >
> > > --
> > > PHP 4 Beta
> >
> >How about the difference in memory resources? Doesn't PHP have a much
> >lower memory overhead than perl? I would think that swapping to disk in
> >low-memory situations would affect performance. :-) Maybe the benchmark
> >tests should point this out somehow.
>
> I don't see any reason why PHP would have a lower memory consumption than
> Perl...
>
> Zeev
I've heard (mostly from usenet posts) that mod_perl has a larger memory
footprint than PHP. I've never seen any hard facts though. It would be
nice to benchmark this and get some real numbers.
Monte