Re: [PHP4BETA] cvs: php4 / php.h /ext/standard/ basic_functions.c crypt.c datetime.c dl.h dns.c file.c microtime.c php_crypt.h

From: Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 18:53:21 +0000
Subject: Re: [PHP4BETA] cvs: php4 / php.h /ext/standard/ basic_functions.c crypt.c datetime.c dl.h dns.c file.c microtime.c php_crypt.h
References: 1  Groups: php.version4 
Request: Send a blank email to php-version4+get-15818@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Fri, 26 May 2000, Andrei Zmievski wrote: > On Fri, 26 May 2000, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > It's not like it will hurt anything for people to call it. The only > > potential problem would be that it might clash with a user-space function > > name, so making it long and somewhat cryptic would be a good idea. > > That's what I meant. What if we used a standard prefix for internal functions instead of obfuscation? That prefix could be uncommon, but descriptive, like _php_warn_not_available(). -adam -- / adam maccabee trachtenberg | visit college life online \ \ adam@student.net | http://www.student.com /

« previous php.version4 (#15818) next »