Re: [PHP4BETA] cvs: php4 / php.h /ext/standard/ basic_functions.c crypt.c datetime.c dl.h dns.c file.c microtime.c php_crypt.h
| From: | Adam Trachtenberg | Date: | Fri, 26 May 2000 18:53:21 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PHP4BETA] cvs: php4 / php.h /ext/standard/ basic_functions.c crypt.c datetime.c dl.h dns.c file.c microtime.c php_crypt.h | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.version4 |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-version4+get-15818@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, 26 May 2000, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> On Fri, 26 May 2000, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> > It's not like it will hurt anything for people to call it. The only
> > potential problem would be that it might clash with a user-space function
> > name, so making it long and somewhat cryptic would be a good idea.
>
> That's what I meant.
What if we used a standard prefix for internal functions instead of
obfuscation? That prefix could be uncommon, but descriptive, like
_php_warn_not_available().
-adam
--
/ adam maccabee trachtenberg | visit college life online \
\ adam@student.net | http://www.student.com /