Re: [PHP4BETA] Child function never get called

My fisr message never got through i think... Sorry if it did cause here it comes again in that case :P Yeah, it's nested in an if statement (all includes are nested in an if so they dont get parsed twice in case i happen to include them again). I managed to solve the problem by include first the parent class then the child class in the "phtml" document that used them, previously i just included the child class and the child class in turn included the parent calss. Well, seems like that should work now anyway, how do i get the CVS version? I'd be happy to help you find bugs and stuff (i'm doing a rather complex thing that uses alot of oo so i might find some :P). Thanks, Johan Isacsson On Tue, 27 Jul 1999, Zeev Suraski wrote: > As a matter of fact, there's a good chance it was my fault after all (well > over 99% isn't always 100% :) > > In case your class definitions were nested inside an IF statement, or a > function, or inherited from a class definition that was in an IF statement > or a function or even an include file, inheritance was not being performed > correctly. > > This is fixed in the latest CVS! > > Sorry, > > Zeev > > At 01:58 27/07/99 , Johan Isacsson wrote: > >I started out preparing the code that i was to send to you and (surprise) > >all of a sudden it worked... > > > >So there must be some mysterious error sneaking around somewhere in the > >include files i removed from the example... > > > >Anyway, sorry that i've bothered you with something that was my problem > >rather than yours... > > > >Thanks, Johan Isacsson > > > >On Tue, 27 Jul 1999, Zeev Suraski wrote: > > > > > At 00:58 27/07/99 , Johan Isacsson wrote: > > > >This is strange, the example i gave you actually echoes 2... > > > >But in the real program which is a bit more complex, it dont work, the > > > >child function dont get called. I saw some cvs info about iheritance with > > > >included files, all my classes are separate includes, could that have > > > >something to do with it? In that case, is it possible to get it? I would > > > >really need it :) > > > > > > The problem you're describing sounds extremely weird, I can't really see > > > how it may happen. The problem with classes and include files under some > > > circumstances was a 'fatal' one, i.e., your script wouldn't work at > > > all > > > under some conditions. It's fixed now. > > > > > > However, that should have no affect on what you're describing. Right now, > > > the only known bug we're aware of is that child constructors, if not > > > explicitly written, default to their parent's constructor (which is the > > PHP > > > 3.0 behavior). > > > > > > I'm pretty sure that what you're describing, the way you're describing > > > it, > > > can't happen. An object instanciated for a given class will use the > > > function table for that given class, and not for that class's parent. I > > > could be wrong of course, but I'm over 99% certain. > > > > > > If you have an example that reproduces the problem, try to cut it down as > > > much as you can (cutting it down, as opposed to writing an test case from > > > scratch, may take a bit more time, but will be easier on the long run), > > and > > > send it to us. If you can't cut it down at all, send it to us the way it > > > is, just so that we can see what's going on. No matter how complex the > > > script is, testing what happens when a new object is instanciated is > > fairly > > > easy for us. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Zeev > > > -- > > > Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> http://www.zend.com/���1� > > > �d.��=�Y� > > > For a PGP public key, finger bourbon@netvision.net.il > > > > > > > > -- > Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> http://www.zend.com/ > For a PGP public key, finger bourbon@netvision.net.il > >