Re: [PHP4BETA] PHP4 Betas
| From: | David Shadoff | Date: | Sat, 30 Oct 1999 15:07:24 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PHP4BETA] PHP4 Betas | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.version4 |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-version4+get-5799@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 12:27 AM 10/30/1999 -0400, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>On Sat, 30 Oct 1999, David Shadoff wrote:
>
>> Did you folks know that PHP4 Beta2 leaves defunct Oracle shadow processes
>> every time a page is accessed ?
>> ( At least on PHP4 Beta2/Apache 1.3.9, Linux RH6.0, Oracle 8i EE
v8.1.5_01 )
>>
>> This is most likely due to either (a) incomplete cleanup during the
>> Oracle-connection takedown, or (b) no SIGCHLD handler.
>>
>> Has this already been addresed in the current CVS ?
>
>Please try the current CVS. You can grab a snapshot from
>http://bonsai.php.net/~sas/snapshots/ or follow the cvs
>instructions at
>http://www.php.net/version4
>
>-Rasmus
I'll take that as a "Probably fixed, but not 100% sure".
I think I'll wait for the upcoming beta release - if I grab the CVS now,
I'll probably start poking around in the code and fixing stuff. ;)
(I *do* want to help; I just don't have much time at the moment).
Please don't take this the wrong way, but I was expecting a "yes/no/not
sure" kind of answer, or for verification via the supplied test script...
(although if Oracle is an uncommon configuration, I understand).
Strangely, I got a similar response on a bug I filed regarding the
ora_connect() function (BugId #2537); and while I don't believe the
maintainter ran the test script, the bug was closed nonetheless. I don't
mind for the bug to have low priority, but is it normal behaviour here to
*close* a bug under such circumstances ?