Re: [PHP4BETA] calling member in parent class
| From: | Andrei Zmievski | Date: | Mon, 07 Feb 2000 19:29:07 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PHP4BETA] calling member in parent class | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.version4 |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-version4+get-9920@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 07 Feb 2000, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
>
> > Tell me then, why does Java have keyword 'super'? I mean, they could
> > also just rename the Parent classes whenever appropriate.
>
> AFAIK (and I might be wrong here, as I don't have a reference with me)
> java does *NOT* have a super keyword. You can only use the function call
> "super()" in exactly *ONE* place, that is the first call of a constructor.
>
> I'd hardly call that a keyword.
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/html/15.doc.html#20448
> I'm with Zeev on this one. Why bother adding another keyword to the
> language when it can be dealt with just as clearly in a simpler fashion.
That is still debatable.
-Andrei
"Music expresses that which can not be said
and on which it is impossible to be silent."
-Victor Hugo