Re: com web/php: Redirect AMQP pages to its github page: error.php
| From: | Hannes Magnusson | Date: | Thu, 15 May 2014 19:34:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: com web/php: Redirect AMQP pages to its github page: error.php | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.webmaster |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-webmaster+get-18922@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Philip Olson <philip@roshambo.org> wrote:
>
> On May 15, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Philip Olson <philip@php.net> wrote:
>>> Commit: 636a531aa68918de34ee4480f812e67679d0762a
>>> Author: philip <philip@roshambo.org> Thu, 15 May 2014 11:07:41 -0700
>>> Parents: 6e1ead211415c4bce472f1c9a653379d44eedb04
>>> Branches: master
>>>
>>> Link:
>>> http://git.php.net/?p=web/php.git;a=commitdiff;h=636a531aa68918de34ee4480f812e67679d0762a
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> Redirect AMQP pages to its github page
>>>
>>
>>
>> I don't think this is a good idea at all.
>> We didn't even do this when smarty.php.net left... Also, people will
>> get used to doing php.net/amqp and getting the redirect and then be
>> pissed off when it no longer works.
>>
>> Also. The github repo you are redirecting to is _NOT_ the one
>> maintained on pecl.php.net. That website link points to:
>> http://pecl.php.net/package/amqp
>>
>> I think this should be reverted.
>
> Hello Hannes,
>
> I think it’s a reasonable addition, and it does include a
> status_header(404) call. There have been several bug reports
> for these missing documents so the idea is to give users what
> they want and for us to deal with fewer bogus bug reports.
>
> The link was updated to the correct github page.
>
> Do you really think people will be angry that php.net/amqp
> won’t work a year or so from now? Maybe a landing page for
> all such changes would be better? It could list big changes
> like amqp, smarty, domxml, and so on, along with links to
> their new homes (or include explanations on why they are
> now homeless). Sounds like that could work better.
I'd prefer a landing page where they have to actively click the new link, yes.
-Hannes