Re: Re: com web/bugs: Workaround for side report frombug #67513:include/functions.php
| From: | Maciej Sobaczewski | Date: | Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:03:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: com web/bugs: Workaround for side report frombug #67513:include/functions.php | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.webmaster |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-webmaster+get-19354@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
W dniu 2014-06-25 19:53, Ferenc Kovacs pisze:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Hannes Magnusson < hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote:On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Maciej Sobaczewski <sobak@php.net> wrote:+1 for reverting it. Then I will rewrite it soon. What about reverting version validation?Hello folks! I've commited this as a temporary [really ;)] workaround for side bug reported here: https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=67513 As reporter wrote:our(On an unrelated note, the issue tracker refused to accept my submission if I selected 'Irrelevant' as the PHP version. Therefore this bug is randomly logged against a random PHP version)This bug is caused by pull request merged recently because it fails oncustom versions like "Irrelevant" and "str_size_and_int64 branch". As my solution is poor and may lead to further problems (one more placetocheck), I have following idea: couldn't we add custom versions in includes/php_versions.php and then just generate them with foreach in show_version_options()? It seems to be more elegant way to achieve this. However, I know that web-bugs is rather complex system so I wanted to consult with you to avoid unexpected bugs (like I did week ago or so). What do you think?I guess we should just revert https://github.com/php/web-bugs/pull/9/files Like I told him, when editing the ticket we often want to triage the version however we like so it is a bit dodgy validation anyway. -Hannes -- PHP Webmaster List Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php