Re: from AOE media

2008/8/28 Denis Zastanceanu <denis.z@aoemedia.com>: >> AFAICT the "PHP.net_fixed.zip" since June 17th is the latest package I >> have, and it does not have that file no. [...] > It's very likely that you have some troubles with the markup versions. As > there was a bit another structure in the last version. I'm attaching an > archive for you, please, study it attentively, it differs a bit from that > you have just shown to me. Thanks, that archive also had the missing images. >>> 3. The padding is removed, and it doesn't look very good, if the design >>> has round shapes. > >>Which padding on which page exactly? > > > > I had a look at http://bjori.php.is/ (it doesn't work now, > this is why I > can't show the page exactly) and found a lot of discrepancies with the > design and the markup, which were given, including padding in the site > header and sidebars. bjori.php.is is my laptop :) http://pb11.php.net/ should be relatively up-to-date, but we are moving our developmental server these days to a new box.. We did make minor changes; - No page margin - Keep the menu centered - Removed margin between the header and menu See http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/phpweb/styles/style_uncompressed.css?r1=1.1.2.5&r2=1.1.2.2&pathrev=NEW_LOOK_2008&view=patch for the CSS changes The only (intentional) differences in the markup are removing few rounded corners. >>> 5. The comments on the same page were changed and the markup was not >>> completely done unlike my version, because of this the edge border became a >>> lot darker. > >>I must have copy&pasted something incorrectly then. The markup of the >> comments we can change at will. > > Please, let me know, if you need our help to change anything (design or > markup). I'll answer questions as soon as I can. I don't see the markup difference - except that the notes are now in its own "box", rather then part of the actual documentation box. Are you sure it wasn't just the missing image/old css file? >>> 9. I specially added the markup of a common page - and they have it >>> looking another way. The same happens to other pages. > >>Please be more specific. > > I meant that besides the homepage, I also attached examples of some markuped > internal pages, which also corresponded to the initially approved design. > I've just noticed, that you didn't use these pages. We did. Click on the link in the top-menu of http://pb11.php.net/ >>> 10. There's not valid code in the side menu. We have another markup in >>> it. > >> At a quick glance I can't see anything wrong with it. > >> Guess I'll have to run it through validator later today. > > > > I also attached this code to the last version. There was a missing </ul> tag, other then that the markup is exactly the same. > Although the last version was improved so that all styles were in one > compressed css file style.css in order to reduce the server load. There is > also an uncompressed version of the same file (for more usability) Thanks for that. Until we have all the pages converted we will be using the uncompressed version since we will, without a doubt, be making slight changes to make sure our manual looks pretty (see http://news.php.net/php.webmaster/2513 for instance). -Hannes