Re: Re: Apache 2.0.36 + PHP + Win2000 Server
| From: | Scott Hurring | Date: | Mon, 10 Jun 2002 19:25:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Apache 2.0.36 + PHP + Win2000 Server | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.windows |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-windows+get-14162@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Well, just IMO, i've used PHP/apache on both linux and windows
for almost 2 years now, and i've never had a single problem with
either platform.
I personally prefer using linux for server jobs and windows for
desktop jobs.... so i don't think i'd ever use windows as a
production server, but I do almost all my development work
on a Win2k machine running mysql/apache/php, i love it :-)
Apache is still classified "beta" on windows, but from what i've
seen, it's a VERY solid beta.
--
Scott Hurring
Systems Programmer
EAC Corporation
scott (*) eac.com
"Matt Babineau" <matt@criticalcode.com> wrote in message
news:004e01c210b2$bef510f0$6501a8c0@developerx...
> Yeah Scott, that's also what I have been hearing. I am wondering though
> is the PHP support in Apache 1.3 or 2.0 even on Windows the same type of
> support that you would get on a Linux machine? I am not a Linux person
> but I may need to be if I can't get good performance out of Windows. I
> am a Windows person by trade but I am slowly moving towards open source
> primarily because I can develop for free. I also was rading about Apache
> 2.0 and it said that there was no SSL support for it. Does anyone know
> if there is SSL support in Apache v1.3 for windows?
>
> Matt Babineau
> Freelance Internet Developer
> -----------------------------------------
> e: matt@criticalcode.com
> p: 603.943.4237
> w: http://www.criticalcode.com
> PO BOX 601
> Manchester, NH 03105
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Hurring [mailto:scottspam@eac.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 3:09 PM
> To: php-windows@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP-WIN] Re: Apache 2.0.36 + PHP + Win2000 Server
>
>
> PHP support for Apache2 is still experimental, so i'd go with Apache
> 1.3.x for now.
>
> Most people i hear from say that PHP/apache is much faster
> than PHP/IIS.
>
> "Matt Babineau" <matt@criticalcode.com> wrote in message
> news:003101c21097$69822c40$6501a8c0@developerx...
> > Hello all;
> >
> > I am looking into a solution for a company and I want to use PHP.
> > However I want to use PHP on Windows but do not want to use IIS.
> > Currently on my test system I run IIS + WinXP + PHP, and I am running
> > PHP as a CGI executable. If I use Apache as the Web server software,
> > will I be able to take full advantage of PHP? Currently I know the CGI
>
> > runs slower then "navtive"? (is that correct?) If I install Apache on
> > a Win2k machine, will my PHP performance be equivalent to a Linux
> > machine?
> >
> > Thank for your response!
> >
> > Matt Babineau
> > Freelance Internet Developer
> > -----------------------------------------
> > e: <mailto:matt@criticalcode.com>
> > matt@criticalcode.com
> > p: 603.943.4237
> > w: <http://www.criticalcode.com/>
> > http://www.criticalcode.com PO BOX
> > 601 Manchester, NH 03105
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>