RE: [PHP-WIN] Re: Apache 2.0.36 + PHP + Win2000 Server

Further to Scott's answer, he's right in the fact that Apache is beta for windows, but stable, however the apache group have ALWAYS said that apache2 would be more secure/stable for windows, as it is an entirely new codebase, as opposed to the direct port from *nix to win32. However I'd be dubious as to how stable apache2 would be just now, and would personally stick with 1.3 My 2cents Ross > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Hurring [mailto:scottspam@eac.com] > Sent: 10 June 2002 20:25 > To: php-windows@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: Apache 2.0.36 + PHP + Win2000 Server > > > Well, just IMO, i've used PHP/apache on both linux and windows > for almost 2 years now, and i've never had a single problem with > either platform. > > I personally prefer using linux for server jobs and windows for > desktop jobs.... so i don't think i'd ever use windows as a > production server, but I do almost all my development work > on a Win2k machine running mysql/apache/php, i love it :-) > > Apache is still classified "beta" on windows, but from what i've > seen, it's a VERY solid beta. > > -- > Scott Hurring > Systems Programmer > EAC Corporation > scott (*) eac.com > > > "Matt Babineau" <matt@criticalcode.com> wrote in message > news:004e01c210b2$bef510f0$6501a8c0@developerx... > > Yeah Scott, that's also what I have been hearing. I am wondering though > > is the PHP support in Apache 1.3 or 2.0 even on Windows the same type of > > support that you would get on a Linux machine? I am not a Linux person > > but I may need to be if I can't get good performance out of Windows. I > > am a Windows person by trade but I am slowly moving towards open source > > primarily because I can develop for free. I also was rading about Apache > > 2.0 and it said that there was no SSL support for it. Does anyone know > > if there is SSL support in Apache v1.3 for windows? > > > > Matt Babineau > > Freelance Internet Developer > > ----------------------------------------- > > e: matt@criticalcode.com > > p: 603.943.4237 > > w: http://www.criticalcode.com > > PO BOX 601 > > Manchester, NH 03105 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Scott Hurring [mailto:scottspam@eac.com] > > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 3:09 PM > > To: php-windows@lists.php.net > > Subject: [PHP-WIN] Re: Apache 2.0.36 + PHP + Win2000 Server > > > > > > PHP support for Apache2 is still experimental, so i'd go with Apache > > 1.3.x for now. > > > > Most people i hear from say that PHP/apache is much faster > > than PHP/IIS. > > > > "Matt Babineau" <matt@criticalcode.com> wrote in message > > news:003101c21097$69822c40$6501a8c0@developerx... > > > Hello all; > > > > > > I am looking into a solution for a company and I want to use PHP. > > > However I want to use PHP on Windows but do not want to use IIS. > > > Currently on my test system I run IIS + WinXP + PHP, and I am running > > > PHP as a CGI executable. If I use Apache as the Web server software, > > > will I be able to take full advantage of PHP? Currently I know the CGI > > > > > runs slower then "navtive"? (is that correct?) If I install Apache on > > > a Win2k machine, will my PHP performance be equivalent to a Linux > > > machine? > > > > > > Thank for your response! > > > > > > Matt Babineau > > > Freelance Internet Developer > > > ----------------------------------------- > > > e: <mailto:matt@criticalcode.com> > > > matt@criticalcode.com > > > p: 603.943.4237 > > > w: <http://www.criticalcode.com/> > > > http://www.criticalcode.com PO BOX > > > 601 Manchester, NH 03105 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > > -- > PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >