RE: [PHP-WINDOWS] Was: Sorry to ask a really lame question...

> Although I can't help you get it working, I'd just like you to > reconsider your > stance on recommending PHP to your company. I am using PHP3 with > no problems. > PHP4 has been out for less than two months IIRC, making it still a "new" > release. There are frequently problems with early releases. For > comparison, > how many service releases and fixpacks did it take to get NT4 to a usable > level? Granted, and nothing is ever final in this industry. For the long term PHP is still an option, but not on this round of projects. > I'm sure the problems will get worked out, but until then you can > still use > PHP3. I understand the syntax is supposed to be mostly > unchanged, so the only > reason to move to PHP4 right away seems to be increased speed -- > if you can get > it working. Not so, one of the areas that ASP beats PHP (3, but reading this newsgroup it would seem 4 has probs too) is in the fact that it handles sessions. Believe me, PHP is something I want to succeed - just for not being M$. However, I think it suffers the same fate of most things open source - a lack of support at a professional level. There is no way I could recommend this list as an alternative to the service agreement we already have with Microsoft. regards, Mikey theology n. A branch of learning devoted to measuring the extent of man's apparently limitless gullibility.