RE: [PHP-WINDOWS] Was: Sorry to ask a really lame question...
| From: | Andrew Phillips | Date: | Thu, 15 Jun 2000 14:24:55 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-WINDOWS] Was: Sorry to ask a really lame question... | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.windows |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-windows+get-479@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I totally disagree with what you are saying. Although I don't know exactly
what you are doing with session handling, I have had nothing but success
with PHP.
The Problem with "Support" is that all the people who you would want to be
giving
you support are currently (and if you are on the Developers List you would
know) doing
bug fixes with all of there time. Although support is nice, bug fixes are
the main priority.
Support is found here, in the groups. I know I try and help people out
whenever I can, and
if I can't I try to figure it out (when I have time) because if I know it,
it might help me
in a future project. Most people who are currently using PHP are developers
and don't have time
to give support to everyone, and that's why it helps to read the
documentation... because it is
all there.
If I can convince a bank, Bank One to be precise, to use PHP... I think
anything is possible.
If you want to meet the most "concerned" Network Admins... go to a bank!
and that's my three cents :)
-Andrew
Andrew Phillips
Applications Developer
Blue Ribbon Internet
2708 Billingsley Road
Columbus, Ohio 43235
Ph: 614.889.9800
Fax: 614.889.9082
Andrew@blueribboninternet.com
http://www.blueribboninternet.com
"we untangle the web"
-----Original Message-----
From: Mikey [mailto:frak@totalise.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 3:43 AM
To: php-list
Subject: RE: [PHP-WINDOWS] Was: Sorry to ask a really lame question...
> Although I can't help you get it working, I'd just like you to
> reconsider your
> stance on recommending PHP to your company. I am using PHP3 with
> no problems.
> PHP4 has been out for less than two months IIRC, making it still a "new"
> release. There are frequently problems with early releases. For
> comparison,
> how many service releases and fixpacks did it take to get NT4 to a usable
> level?
Granted, and nothing is ever final in this industry. For the long term PHP
is still an option, but not on this round of projects.
> I'm sure the problems will get worked out, but until then you can
> still use
> PHP3. I understand the syntax is supposed to be mostly
> unchanged, so the only
> reason to move to PHP4 right away seems to be increased speed --
> if you can get
> it working.
Not so, one of the areas that ASP beats PHP (3, but reading this newsgroup
it would seem 4 has probs too) is in the fact that it handles sessions.
Believe me, PHP is something I want to succeed - just for not being M$.
However, I think it suffers the same fate of most things open source - a
lack of support at a professional level. There is no way I could recommend
this list as an alternative to the service agreement we already have with
Microsoft.
regards,
Mikey
theology n. A branch of learning devoted to measuring the extent of man's
apparently limitless gullibility.