Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Current status
| From: | Gwynne Raskind | Date: | Tue, 16 Dec 2008 05:02:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Current status | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | svn.migration |
| Request: | Send a blank email to svn-migration+get-186@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Dec 15, 2008, at 11:17 PM, shire wrote:
Thanks. I do usually work in svn repositories on this level, as sometimes it's more useful to have all the branches for copying/moving/reference etc. For my uses of PHP I probably won't need this either, but while I agree it may not be necessary (and perhaps not always wanted due to size), I'm not sure if other people will want to work this way or not if they touch a lot more branches and/or tags. (?).If more people have the same issue, we'll look into dealing with it. A lot of those branches and tags are probably bogus artifacts of the conversion process and poor CVS repo maintenance over the years.
You've got that right! It runs about 14 hours on the CVS/SVN box :). -- Gwynne, Daughter of the Code "This whole world is an asylum for the incurable."Makes sense, I'm sure the conversion process isn't a short one ;-). thanks!At the moment it's not synchronized to CVS in any way. It will be occassionally updated if and when I have cause to re-run the entire conversion. I have no plans at the moment to do a synchronization scheme; it will be a flip-a-switch change when SVN goes into effect.Sweet, how often is this updated?