Re: Re: File Download Headers
| From: | Barry | Date: | Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:44:24 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: File Download Headers | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-238153@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
tedd schrieb:
At 1:44 AM -0400 6/16/06, Chris Shiflett wrote:Both are ok! :) Barry -- Smileys rule (cX.x)C --o(^_^o) Dance for me! ^(^_^)o (o^_^)o o(^_^)^ o(^_^o)Richard Lynch wrote:Chris: Barry says you can use these three: header("Content-Type: application/force-download"); header("Content-Type: application/octet-stream"); header("Content-Type: application/download"); Richard says only use this one: header("Content-type: application/octet-stream"); And, you say use both. Which both? tedd Either my three or the one richard mentioned.It is possible that all "modern" browsers have given in to whichever johnny-come-lately 'standard' made up the Content-disposition header.The original RFC for it is dated June 1995, so it's not too recent. There are plenty of useful aspects of HTTP not defined in RFC 2616.Content-type: application/octet-streamThere's no reason you can't use both. Chris