Re: Re: File Download Headers

At 12:44 PM +0200 6/16/06, Barry wrote: >tedd schrieb: >>At 1:44 AM -0400 6/16/06, Chris Shiflett wrote: >>>Richard Lynch wrote: >>>>It is possible that all "modern" browsers have given >>>>in to whichever johnny-come-lately 'standard' made >>>>up the Content-disposition header. >>>The original RFC for it is dated June 1995, so it's not too recent. There are >>>plenty of useful aspects of HTTP not defined in RFC 2616. >>> >>>>Content-type: application/octet-stream >>>There's no reason you can't use both. >>> >>>Chris >> >>Chris: >> >>Barry says you can use these three: >> >>header("Content-Type: application/force-download"); >>header("Content-Type: application/octet-stream"); >>header("Content-Type: application/download"); >> >>Richard says only use this one: >> >>header("Content-type: application/octet-stream"); >> >>And, you say use both. Which both? >> >>tedd >> >Either my three or the one richard mentioned. > >Both are ok! > >:) > >Barry Ahaaa, those four both. I get it, thanks. tedd -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com