Re: Re: File Download Headers

I have now officially GIVEN UP on this thread. On Fri, June 16, 2006 6:03 am, tedd wrote: > At 12:44 PM +0200 6/16/06, Barry wrote: >>tedd schrieb: >>>At 1:44 AM -0400 6/16/06, Chris Shiflett wrote: >>>>Richard Lynch wrote: >>>>>It is possible that all "modern" browsers have given >>>>>in to whichever johnny-come-lately 'standard' made >>>>>up the Content-disposition header. >>>>The original RFC for it is dated June 1995, so it's not too recent. >>>> There are plenty of useful aspects of HTTP not defined in RFC 2616. >>>> >>>>>Content-type: application/octet-stream >>>>There's no reason you can't use both. >>>> >>>>Chris >>> >>>Chris: >>> >>>Barry says you can use these three: >>> >>>header("Content-Type: application/force-download"); >>>header("Content-Type: application/octet-stream"); >>>header("Content-Type: application/download"); >>> >>>Richard says only use this one: >>> >>>header("Content-type: application/octet-stream"); >>> >>>And, you say use both. Which both? >>> >>>tedd >>> >>Either my three or the one richard mentioned. >> >>Both are ok! >> >>:) >> >>Barry > > > Ahaaa, those four both. > > I get it, thanks. > > tedd > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > http://sperling.com > http://ancientstones.com > http://earthstones.com > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm