Re: cvs: php-src /ext/mbstring mbstring.c mbstring.h /main rfc1867.c
| From: | Rui Hirokawa | Date: | Sun, 26 Oct 2003 07:20:33 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: cvs: php-src /ext/mbstring mbstring.c mbstring.h /main rfc1867.c | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.cvs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-cvs+get-24270@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Ilia,
I appreciate your continious effort about QC process.
GPC bug in rfc1867.c is not critical one, and I agree with you
it is not preferable in the final RC process.
I will revert my GPC related patch in a couple of hours.
But, I shoudn't revert an another license related patch
as shown below because the license compatibility has priority.
+2003-10-25 Rui Hirokawa <rui_hirokawa@ybb.ne.jp>
+
+ * (PHP_4_3)
+ ext/mbstring/mbstring.dsp:
+ fixed windows build.
+
+ * (PHP_4_3)
+ ext/mbstring/README.libmbfl
+ ext/mbstring/config.m4
+ ext/mbstring/cp932_table.h
+ ext/mbstring/html_entities.c
+ ext/mbstring/mbfilter.c
+ ext/mbstring/mbfilter.h
+ ext/mbstring/mbfilter_cn.c
+ ext/mbstring/mbfilter_cn.h
+ ext/mbstring/mbfilter_ja.c
+ ext/mbstring/mbfilter_ja.h
+ ext/mbstring/mbfilter_kr.c
+ ext/mbstring/mbfilter_kr.h
+ ext/mbstring/mbfilter_ru.c
+ ext/mbstring/mbfilter_ru.h
+ ext/mbstring/mbfilter_tw.c
+ ext/mbstring/mbfilter_tw.h
+ ext/mbstring/mbregex.c
+ ext/mbstring/mbregex.h
+ ext/mbstring/mbstring.c
+ ext/mbstring/mbstring.dsp
+ ext/mbstring/mbstring.h
+ ext/mbstring/unicode_table.h
+ ext/mbstring/unicode_table_cn.h
+ ext/mbstring/unicode_table_ja.h
+ ext/mbstring/unicode_table_kr.h
+ ext/mbstring/unicode_table_ru.h
+ ext/mbstring/unicode_table_tw.h:
+ mbfilter is replaced with libmbfl to maintain the licence compatibility.
+ mbregex.[ch] is moved to mbregex/ for the same reason.
+
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 00:46:29 -0400
Ilia Alshanetsky <ilia@prohost.org> wrote:
> On October 25, 2003 07:14 pm, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> > Ah, thought it was the other patch. However, I wouldn't call the above a
> > new feature. That one is a bug fix as it was an oversight to not also
> > convert form fields in multipart posts.
>
> Well, it is a mix of a feature & a bug fix. The bug if we decide to call it
> such is by no means critical and 2 days before the release time is not a time
> to make any non critical changes simply because there is no time to test
> them. rfc1867.c is very sensitive code which previously had a number of
> security faults at least 1 directly caused by mbstring related changes. It is
> my opinion such changes have no place this late in the release cycle.
>
> Ilia
--
Rui Hirokawa <rui_hirokawa@ybb.ne.jp>