Re: cvs: php4 /ext/standard file.c

From:	Zeev Suraski	Date:	Sat, 23 Dec 2000 15:09:36 +0000
Subject:	Re: cvs: php4 /ext/standard file.c
References:	1	Groups:	php.cvs
Request:	Send a blank email to php-cvs+get-3269@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message

At 16:56 23/12/2000, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:

SS>>     The rationale behind SIGXFSZ seems to be that a process
SS>>     should be terminated, if it exceeds process limits.
If so, shouldn't we comply with that thought and let the process die? Like, if Unix standards guys think that's right for a process to die in this case, they should know better?

I'd be in favour of catching it and displaying a PHP-level fatal error. There's nothing magical about catching signals... Zeev -- Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> CTO & co-founder, Zend Technologies Ltd. http://www.zend.com/