Re: cvs: php4 /ext/domxml config.m4 php_domxml.c php_domxml.h
| From: | Joao Prado Maia | Date: | Tue, 08 Jan 2002 14:14:01 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: cvs: php4 /ext/domxml config.m4 php_domxml.c php_domxml.h | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.cvs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-cvs+get-8979@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Jaroslaw Kolakowski wrote:
> jarkol Mon Jan 7 19:31:26 2002 EDT
>
> Modified files:
> /php4/ext/domxml config.m4 php_domxml.c php_domxml.h
> Log:
> - Added functions: htmldoc(), htmldocfile(), domxml_htmldumpmem().
Just to be really picky, but shouldn't these functions be named
html_doc(), html_doc_file() and domxml_html_dump_mem() ?
I understand that we already have xmldoc(), xmldocfile(), xmltree() and
even domxml_dumpmem(), but I still think we should stick we the coding
standards. It is an extra good thing that this extensions is still
experimental so we don't have to worry about BC that much.
Am I totally off base here ?
Joao
--
João Prado Maia <jpm@phpbrasil.com>
http://phpbrasil.com - php com um jeitinho brasileiro
--
Precisando de consultoria em desenvolvimento para a Internet ?
Impleo.net - http://impleo.net/?lang=br