Re: cvs: php4 /ext/domxml config.m4 php_domxml.c php_domxml.h

From: Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 14:14:01 +0000
Subject: Re: cvs: php4 /ext/domxml config.m4 php_domxml.c php_domxml.h
References: 1  Groups: php.cvs 
Request: Send a blank email to php-cvs+get-8979@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Jaroslaw Kolakowski wrote: > jarkol Mon Jan 7 19:31:26 2002 EDT > > Modified files: > /php4/ext/domxml config.m4 php_domxml.c php_domxml.h > Log: > - Added functions: htmldoc(), htmldocfile(), domxml_htmldumpmem(). Just to be really picky, but shouldn't these functions be named html_doc(), html_doc_file() and domxml_html_dump_mem() ? I understand that we already have xmldoc(), xmldocfile(), xmltree() and even domxml_dumpmem(), but I still think we should stick we the coding standards. It is an extra good thing that this extensions is still experimental so we don't have to worry about BC that much. Am I totally off base here ? Joao -- João Prado Maia <jpm@phpbrasil.com> http://phpbrasil.com - php com um jeitinho brasileiro -- Precisando de consultoria em desenvolvimento para a Internet ? Impleo.net - http://impleo.net/?lang=br

« previous php.cvs (#8979) next »