Re: Re: MySql or postgre?
| From: | john slee | Date: | Wed, 29 Nov 2000 22:37:42 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: MySql or postgre? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.db |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-db+get-4852@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 04:28:48PM -0600, Paul DuBois wrote:
[ ... ]
> more important for the applications they needed. The addition of transaction
> support happened because they were able to build on the work of others. You
> characterize that as incompetence. I'd say it makes a lot of sense to use
> that approach, rather than reinventing the wheel.
therefore you are either (a) nonsensical or (b) still using a database
from the 1960s or earlier - anything later would be reinventing the
wheel by your standards :-)
[ ... ]
j.
--
.----------+------------------------------------.
|John Slee `-----------. <john@chirp.com.au>|
|Chirp Web Design | http://www.chirp.com.au|
|Phone: +61 2 62301871 `----. +61 2 62301515 Fax|
`---------------------------+-------------------'