Re: Adding all extensions to bugs.php bug type list
| From: | Stanislav Malyshev | Date: | Mon, 04 Sep 2000 08:07:10 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Adding all extensions to bugs.php bug type list | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev php.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-31900@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
ZG>> If no-one has any objections (or at least ones that they
ZG>> cannot be talked out of :) I would like to expand the list
ZG>> of bug types at bugs.php.net/bugs.php
I cried for that for monthes :) Just never had time to do it myself...
ZG>> Adding all of the types will probably increase a new users
ZG>> confusion when submitting a bug report. However, at least
ZG>> we would be able to accurately re-categorize their bug
ZG>> reports... :)
On the contrary, when user have now interbase problem and there's no
interbase section, he puts it on Other, on Scriptin engine, on Misbehaving
Function and dozen of other places. When there's "Interbase" section, most
users will be intelligent enough to do the right thing.
ZG>> Class/Object related
I would not make that. This should go to scripting engine, user won't be
able to tell anyway if it's class-object or references or arrays or what.
ZG>> Filesystem function related
I woould not separate between directory and filesystem functions. That's
all filesystem functions.
ZG>> Graphics related
You mean GD? That it should be Graphics (GD) or something like that...
ZG>> HTTP related
And what's that?
ZG>> Misc.
What the difference between Misc. and Other?
ZG>> URL related
What's here?
ZG>> Variables related
And what here?
--
Stanislav Malyshev stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/
+972-3-6139665 ext.106