Re: Named output buffers

This syntax is already taken for a different thing. At any rate, I don't see how a non-recursive, stack-like implementation of output buffers makes sense. Zeev At 21:04 13/09/2000, Andrei Zmievski wrote:

What do you think about the idea of having named output buffers? Example: ob_start('buffer1'); ... ... ob_start('buffer2'); ... ob_get_contents('buffer1'); ... ob_get_contents('buffer2'); ob_end_clean('buffer1'); ob_end_clean('buffer2'); -Andrei Magic 8-ball is much more powerful than we thought. I mean, back in the 70's it was predicting the nature of software in the 90's -- "Outlook not so good". -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help@lists.php.net To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net

-- Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> http://www.zend.com/