Re: Named output buffers

Quoting Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>: > >Oooh, that would be _very_ useful! > > How? If you're using the output buffer support for xslt, or to compress content, or something else that requires capturing all of the page output, being able to use a seperate buffer to capture the output of things like highlight_string, fpassthru, or other functions that normal output straight to the browser would be great... As it stands now, you need to save the contents of the output buffer in a variable, then do your stuff, then reset it... not to mention checking to see if it's even being used yet... -chuck -- Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org> -- "Alice found a niche in the market for her diabolically malodorous rabbit pellet."