Re: Re: Calling parent's constructor

I also agree that we should avoid adding any unnecessary code to the RC. Lets get the current release out. We can start on the new RC the day after ;) (I am only half joking here :) --zak ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joey Smith" <joey@joeysmith.com> To: "PHP Quality Assurance" <php-qa@lists.php.net> Cc: "PHP Developers" <php-dev@lists.php.net> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 8:21 PM Subject: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Calling parent's constructor > I'm with Sasch here. I don't want this in 4.0.4 at this point. > > On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Sascha Schumann wrote the following to Zeev Suraski : > > > > Seriously, I think it makes sense. Calling the parent constructor is basic > > > functionality and should be easy to do. Hell, it's even easy to implement. > > > > ++1. > > > > > I think we should wait for 4.0.5 for this. What's the consensus? > > > > 4.0.5. If you want to push it into Zend right now, I'd like > > to create a branch on cvs.zend.com for the Zend repository. > > > > - Sascha > > > > > > > > > -- > PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-qa-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > For additional commands, e-mail: php-qa-help@lists.php.net > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net >