Re: Calling parent's constructor
| From: | Kristian Köhntopp | Date: | Thu, 14 Dec 2000 08:14:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Calling parent's constructor | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-41299@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Zeev Suraski wrote:
> >No, probably not. My original suggestion was to recognize
> >parent::parent() construct -- I don't know how Zeev & Andi would react
> >to that.
>
> Seriously, I think it makes sense. Calling the parent constructor is basic
> functionality and should be easy to do. Hell, it's even easy to implement.
Inherited constructors are already broken in Zend, and cannot
be fixed any more. This looks sensible. I suggest parent::__parent(),
though, to go along with __wakeup(), __sleep(), and __delegate().
Special names should be in a somehow special corner of the
namespace.
Kristian
--
Kristian Köhntopp, NetUSE AG Siemenswall, D-24107 Kiel
Tel: +49 431 386 436 00, Fax: +49 431 386 435 99
Using PHP3? See our web development library at http://phplib.netuse.de/