Re: Calling parent's constructor

That sounds sensible. On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Kristian Köhntopp wrote the following to zeev@zend.com : > Zeev Suraski wrote: > > >No, probably not. My original suggestion was to recognize > > >parent::parent() construct -- I don't know how Zeev & Andi would react > > >to that. > > > > Seriously, I think it makes sense. Calling the parent constructor is basic > > functionality and should be easy to do. Hell, it's even easy to implement. > > Inherited constructors are already broken in Zend, and cannot > be fixed any more. This looks sensible. I suggest parent::__parent(), > though, to go along with __wakeup(), __sleep(), and __delegate(). > > Special names should be in a somehow special corner of the > namespace. > > Kristian > >