Re: Latest commit -- depreciation of call_user_method()

> >I really don't think that this should be something to strive for. There > >should be a really really good reason for making changes that break > >backward compatibility. We have that second version number reserved for > >such BC breaking changes that don't involve a huge rewrite (which is what > >the first version number is for). And yes, we have been very afraid to > >make such changes, as we should be! And the fact that we have never had a > >.1 is an indication of just how unwilling we have been to make such > >changes. I see this as a success and not as a failure. Imagine writing a > > I don't agree. Have you noticed the thread about domxml currently running > in php-dev@? Wouldn't that justify a 4.1? What would? No, I don't think a single extension should affect the PHP version number to that extent. But I do think we should be moving towards versioning the extensions individually. -Rasmus