Re: Latest commit -- depreciation of call_user_method()

From: Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 15:54:55 +0000
Subject: Re: Latest commit -- depreciation of call_user_method()
References: 1  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-55790@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> >> And btw. Why not have a function in PHP core that can be used to get the > >> desired extensions remotely from pear.php.net? If we have a > >> PHP_#ext#_API_NO, running a 'update_php_extensions()' would > >> go and grab the updated (if the extension HAS been updated) one..etc.. > >> (I'm just thinking out loud..ignore me :) > > > >There is the start of a set of command line tools for doing this. > > I don't think having those separately is a good idea. > More like a function set in PHP would make more sense. > As you have to have the core PHP anyway? I don't see how that would work. The command-line tool would pull down the tarball, phpize it to pull in the local configuration settings, then build the extension. Doing all this from an internal PHP call doesn't make any sense to me. That's like saying that phpize should be an internal PHP function instead of the current shell script that it is now. -Rasmus

« previous php.dev (#55790) next »