Re: New zend_compile.c to solve all of the duplicate function problems

I think we can relax this thread now... Can we agree on this: 1. Stay with what we've been having until today, as in, revert the current patch. It should be a one liner. 2. Look into adding an implicit _once directive into PHP. I want some feedback on this, to see if it's really going to help, or whether both include() types are used simultaneously... 3. Discuss packaging extensions alongside the namespace plans. We can discuss that now, but I do agree with Stig as far as seeing them as closely related to ZE2 features, namely, the namespace features. I still hate 'use', though :) Zeev At 12:12 21-10-01, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:

DB>> I do not know Java. In Perl, namespaces exist, so it's a DB>> completely different ballgame. But even still, it's not the DB>> responsibility of the user to know the inner workings of a DB>> module or package in Perl. If we talking about "how to quick hack PHP engine so that it would suit this-minute needs of someone" - it is not so interesting to me to discuss. If we talk about PHP strategy - it's already accepted that PHP needs namespaces, and there's a work in progress on it, so it's not "completely different ballgame". DB>> function library from the user themselves. Why are you DB>> continuing this argument? Mostly because I have got tens of answers to this thread and only *one single answer* on my package proposal. So if this thread is the place where my voice is heard - I will use it :) -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ +972-3-6139665 ext.115 -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help@lists.php.net To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net