Re: cvs: php4 /ext/domxml config.m4 php_domxml.c php_domxml.h
| From: | Jaroslaw Kolakowski | Date: | Tue, 08 Jan 2002 17:47:03 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: cvs: php4 /ext/domxml config.m4 php_domxml.c php_domxml.h | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-76266@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> > Just to be really picky, but shouldn't these functions be named
> > html_doc(), html_doc_file() and domxml_html_dump_mem() ?
> >
> > I understand that we already have xmldoc(), xmldocfile(), xmltree() and
> > even domxml_dumpmem(), but I still think we should stick we the coding
> > standards. It is an extra good thing that this extensions is still
> > experimental so we don't have to worry about BC that much.
> >
> > Am I totally off base here ?
>
> +1 here.
OK. I will change it.
And what about changing names of xmldoc(), xmldocfile(), xmltree() and domxml_dumpmem() then? If the
code is experimental, it would be only naughty, but not forbidden.
Jarek