RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/msession msession.c
| From: | Sean R. Bright | Date: | Sun, 10 Feb 2002 18:34:20 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/msession msession.c | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-79909@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Mark:
Don't get me wrong, I have looked into msession, and it does indeed look
useful to the PHP community as a whole. It just doesn't make sense to
_me_ that backwards compatibility is being maintained to older versions
of PHP from the HEAD development branch. I am not saying "remove your
extension" (its not my place to say that even if I was), I'm just saying
that if you have msession users that are running PHP 4.0.5 and need the
extension, there should be a tarball or a CVS tag they can use instead of
hitting the HEAD branch. That way everyone is happy. At least I think
they are...
Regards,
Sean
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mlwmohawk@mohawksoft.com [mailto:mlwmohawk@mohawksoft.com]
> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 2:13 PM
> To: elixer@erols.com
> Cc: adam@indexdata.dk; php-dev@lists.php.net
> Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/msession
> msession.c
>
>
> > I think the issue is not compatibility with external
> libraries but with
> > previous versions of the engine. IMHO, there is no reason
> for a module
> > in the HEAD branch to be compatible with older versions of
> PHP. In the
> > case of MySQL and GD, the ifdefs are used to maintain compatibility
> > with the libraries, not PHP/Zend.
> >
> > Just my $0.02
>
> This is something I don't understand. I really don't. If backward
> compatibility is possible, should it not remain?
>
> I am a bit ticked off that you guys are so militant about
> silly things
> like a few "ifdefs" and comment format. I don't see what the
> big deal is,
> and the attitue with which you guys respond is outrageous.
>
> As I said in another post, msession may not be the way to accomplish
> something, but what it intends to accomplish IMHO is vital
> for PHP. An SQL
> database is a very bad place in which to store shared
> sessions, NFS is
> worse. If not msession, what? srm? maybe. What else?
>
> Every time I check code in I get some amount of flack. If it
> isn't "ifdef"
> is is the name of a define. Just pedantic nonsense. There are
> extensons
> that are far less readable, with far more numerous ifdefs, and coding
> inconsistencies.
>
> If you take the time to learn about msession, judge for
> yourself if it is
> worth while for PHP. If you think it is, I'd like your help
> to make it
> better. If you don't think is is important, that's fine. If
> no one thinks
> it is worth doing, I will more than willingly remove it from
> the PHP cvs.
>
> Just get off my back about it. I have a full time job, a kid, a
> girlfriend, and a full life. I don't NEED to do this, I WANT
> to do this. I
> believe I can help users deploying PHP in large installations with
> msession. If this is not true, hell I won't waste my time anymore.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>