Re: Re: aggergate vs MI
| From: | brad lafountain | Date: | Mon, 08 Apr 2002 21:55:46 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: aggergate vs MI | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-82293@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
--- Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
> At 00:44 09/04/2002, brad lafountain wrote:
> >If aggregation is included then i see it is absoulty necessary to include MI
> >too.
>
> In my opinion, only one of them (at most) has room in PHP. Having both is
> messy. My personal preference is MI, which is why I prefer tagging
> aggregation as experimental.
Well i would have totally agreed with you yesterday.. but i have convinced
myself that there is use for aggregation. Me personally i would never use it.
But i can see somepeople using it.
But giving the user a way to "MI" without having "MI" support(aggregation) will
create alot of messy code. It wont even give the user a change to write good OO
code.
Can you explain why you can't see room for both of them?
- Brad
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/