Re: Re: aggergate vs MI
| From: | brad lafountain | Date: | Mon, 08 Apr 2002 21:59:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: aggergate vs MI | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-82295@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
--- Steve Meyers <steve-php-dev@spamaphobia.com> wrote:
> If MI can be emulated using aggregation, how hard would it be to add the
> syntax for MI to the language, but have it implement it using aggregation?
That would be the biggest hack. MI isn't that hard to implement. It probally
would take a good developer less than a weeks time to do.
- Brad
>
> Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> > At 00:44 09/04/2002, brad lafountain wrote:
> >>If aggregation is included then i see it is absoulty necessary to include
> >>MI too.
> >
> > In my opinion, only one of them (at most) has room in PHP. Having both is
> > messy. My personal preference is MI, which is why I prefer tagging
> > aggregation as experimental.
> >
> > Zeev
>
>
>
> --
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/