RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: aggergate vs MI

Indeed. I would very much like it. It could open new doors to work with partner companies that can extend what ever we supply them with (which is closed source for the most part) Sounds like a smart thing for Zend to implement :-) (As do so many other things ... maybe we should first all work together to extend the day to 30 hours) Best regards, Lukas Smith smith@dybnet.de _______________________________ DybNet Internet Solutions GbR Reuchlinstr. 10-11 Gebäude 4 1.OG Raum 6 (4.1.6) 10553 Berlin Germany Tel. : +49 30 83 22 50 00 Fax : +49 30 83 22 50 07 www.dybnet.de info@dybnet.de _______________________________ > -----Original Message----- > From: Wez Furlong [mailto:wez@thebrainroom.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 1:10 PM > To: Pierre-Alain Joye > Cc: Wez Furlong; Zeev Suraski; php-dev@lists.php.net; Kristian Koehntopp; > Stig S. Bakken > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: aggergate vs MI > > On 09/04/02, "Pierre-Alain Joye" <pajoye@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > > > I have failed to understand what interfaces would mean > > > in a language such as PHP, though, while I can see the clear hands-on > use > > > for MI. Can you explain how you envision interfaces as useful > constructs > > > in PHP, and their advantages over MI, considering the fact all of the > > > binary compatibility issues don't apply? > > The only needs of interfaces I see is only for php encoded and closed > source > > (we can called them binaries ;) ). And in this case, I do not like it > ;). > > And yet some of us need to earn a living :-) > This would actually benefit PHP, because it could attract bigger, more > serious development using PHP. > > --Wez. > > > > -- > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php