Re: <?= and <%= both work, why not <?php=
| From: | J Smith | Date: | Fri, 26 Apr 2002 19:48:54 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: <?= and <%= both work, why not <?php= | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-83397@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Just read that myself at w3c.org. I hate the format of their
recommendations, god. It takes forever for me to find anything specific in
their specs.
J
derick@php.net wrote:
> From: http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006#sec-pi
>
> [16] PI ::= '<?' PITarget (S (Char* - (Char* '?>' Char*)))?
> '?>'
> [17] PITarget ::= Name - (('X' | 'x') ('M' | 'm')
> ('L' | 'l'))
>
> [3] S ::= (#x20 | #x9 | #xD | #xA)+
> [2] Char ::= #x9 | #xA | #xD | [#x20-#xD7FF] | [#xE000-#xFFFD] |
> [[#x10000-#x10FFFF]
>
> Meaning that between <?php and ?> everytning is allowed but '?>'.
>
> Derick
>
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, J Smith wrote:
>
>> Are you positive about that? I would have assumed so, too, but it passes
>> both the Sablotron and Xerces XML processors without so much as a
>> warning.
>>
>> J