Re: <?= and <%= both work, why not <?php=
| From: | Andrew Lindeman | Date: | Sat, 27 Apr 2002 02:38:34 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: <?= and <%= both work, why not <?php= | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-83409@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I'm pretty sure that XML is a scaled down and easier to learn/work with
version of SGML
Correct me if I'm wrong
--Andrew
On Friday 26 April 2002 07:30 pm, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 03:18 27/04/2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> >It looks like we can. I was assuming the SGML characteristics for XML and
> >it looks like I was wrong. A '>' is ok inside the <?php ?> tags.
>
> Ok, so that's actually useful. But it sounds odd - XML is not SGML
> compliant?
>
> Zeev
--
35. I think we can plug just one more thing in to this outlet strip
with out triping the breaker.
--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say