Re: <?= and <%= both work, why not <?php=
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Sat, 27 Apr 2002 01:44:26 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: <?= and <%= both work, why not <?php= | ||
| Groups: | php.dev | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-83410@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Yes, but I thought it was SGML compliant (as in, some sort of a subset of SGML with lots of predefined rules, but still, falls into the SGML language category).
But then, I could very well be wrong about this.
Zeev
At 05:37 27/04/2002, Andrew Lindeman wrote:
I'm pretty sure XML is a scaled down and easier to learn/work with version of SGML. Correct me if I'm wrong --Andrew On Friday 26 April 2002 07:30 pm, Zeev Suraski wrote: At 03:18 27/04/2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:It looks like we can. I was assuming the SGML characteristics for XML and it looks like I was wrong. A '>' is ok inside the <?php ?> tags.Ok, so that's actually useful. But it sounds odd - XML is not SGML compliant? Zeev -- "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." (Linus Torvalds about the superiority of Linux on the Amterdam Linux Symposium)