Re: bundling libxml2 / bundling locations

brad lafountain wrote: > Ok, > > But take ext/domxml it requires a newerversion of libxml2. I didn't > have it installed on my machine when i installed php. If we bundle > say a specfic version of libxml2 that domxml depends on, then it > won't matter how fast pased the development is, ext/domxml won't use > it. We can obvisouly peridocially upgrade the version that is bundled > and you can have an override if you want to use a different version > that is installed on a system. As xml gets more and more popular i > feel that domxml will be more and more popular. I'd make it an optional download, because there are always people like me who have all the libraries already installed with their distro. People with non-deb distros or who are lacking skills with Linux but want to do it anyway would definately benefit from this. It would be for pure convinience, like all the precompiled libraries bundled with the Windows-download, gdlib is an entirely different matter. regards Wagner -- When did ignorance become a point of view?