Re: bundling libxml2 / bundling locations

On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 08:12:27AM +0900, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote : > Brad Lafountain wrote: > >Ok, > > > > But take ext/domxml it requires a newerversion of libxml2. I didn't have > > it > >installed on my machine when i installed php. If we bundle say a specfic > >version of libxml2 that domxml depends on, then it won't matter how fast > >pased > >the development is, ext/domxml won't use it. We can obvisouly peridocially > >upgrade the version that is bundled and you can have an override if you > >want to > >use a different version that is installed on a system. As xml gets more and > >more popular i feel that domxml will be more and more popular. > > > > "Build outta the box" > > +1 for libxml2 bundle. This already discussed, isn't this? -1 It's very actively developed. What is the reason of shared libraries if we don't use it?! GD is a completely different story. I even think it's not necessary to bundle libmysqlclient because it's really installed everywhere where mysql is available. - Markus -- GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc Wishlist: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/wishlist