Re: bundling libxml2 / bundling locations

Brad Lafountain wrote:

Ok, But take ext/domxml it requires a newerversion of libxml2. I didn't have it installed on my machine when i installed php. If we bundle say a specfic version of libxml2 that domxml depends on, then it won't matter how fast pased the development is, ext/domxml won't use it. We can obvisouly peridocially upgrade the version that is bundled and you can have an override if you want to use a different version that is installed on a system. As xml gets more and more popular i feel that domxml will be more and more popular. "Build outta the box"

+1 for libxml2 bundle. This already discussed, isn't this? ext/xml/libxml2 ? Odd location, but domxml support without xml does not make much sense to me. -- Yasuo Ohgaki