Re: Re: [RFC] include_ini and include_ini_dir

ok, so we should write a mini-language for the ini? or should we just make it php? then we just need to scan/interpret it. if we want to make the ini file more powerful, there are *many* things that can be done... it just really depends how powerful it needs to be (especially since php works fine without an ini file at all) devon Original Message: ----------------- From: Markus Fischer mfischer@guru.josefine.at Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 18:29:00 +0200 To: dviner@yahoo-inc.com, derick@php.net, devon@sitetronics.com, php-dev@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] include_ini and include_ini_dir On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 09:20:03AM -0700, David Viner wrote : > Hmm... in the apache world, the srm.conf and access.conf were deprecated, > but the Include directive in the configuration file is still maintained. > That is, by default, people use a single apache configuration file. > However, for specialized cases, like Brian's, people have the ability to use > multiple files if they want the extra work of multiple configuration files. Apache also has the <if> tags which makes things even more useful when it comes to including of optional features. -- GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc - It's not a fug, it's a beature. - -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .