Re: Re: [RFC] include_ini and include_ini_dir

The last time we had this discussion a few People didn't liked that kind of flex^H^H^H^Hcomplexity in the include file. Hell, you even could just use an PHP source-file for it ... :) On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 12:34:30PM -0400, devon@sitetronics.com wrote : > ok, so we should write a mini-language for the ini? or should we just make > it php? then we just need to scan/interpret it. > > if we want to make the ini file more powerful, there are *many* things that > can be done... it just really depends how powerful it needs to be > (especially since php works fine without an ini file at all) > > devon > > Original Message: > ----------------- > From: Markus Fischer mfischer@guru.josefine.at > Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 18:29:00 +0200 > To: dviner@yahoo-inc.com, derick@php.net, devon@sitetronics.com, > php-dev@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] include_ini and include_ini_dir > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 09:20:03AM -0700, David Viner wrote : > > Hmm... in the apache world, the srm.conf and access.conf were deprecated, > > but the Include directive in the configuration file is still maintained. > > That is, by default, people use a single apache configuration file. > > However, for specialized cases, like Brian's, people have the ability to > use > > multiple files if they want the extra work of multiple configuration > files. > > Apache also has the <if> tags which makes things even more > useful when it comes to including of optional features. > > -- > GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc > - It's not a fug, it's a beature. - > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > mail2web - Check your email from the web at > http://mail2web.com/ . > -- GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc - It's not a fug, it's a beature. -