Re: Re: [RFC] include_ini and include_ini_dir

On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Matthew Walker wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, devon@sitetronics.com wrote: > > > >> ok, so we should write a mini-language for the ini? or should we just > >> make it php? then we just need to scan/interpret it. > > > > Nope, sounds like a bad idea for something simple as a .ini file. > > > > For what it's worth, here's my +1 on enabling a php-parsed .ini file. And to > maintain backwards compatibility, if the file had no php tags in it, it > could be parsed as per the old .ini method. I'm -1 on this complexity. Having an include is OK, but making it a PHP Script will make it very complex, and it's also very hard to implement. Also, do we really need that? Derick --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Did I help you? http://www.derickrethans.nl/link.php?url=giftlist Frequent ranting: http://www.derickrethans.nl/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PHP: Scripting the Web - derick@php.net All your branches are belong to me! SRM: Script Running Machine - www.vl-srm.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------------