Re: Bug #20308 (Feature Request)

That was one of the comments I was looking for "Is this really necessary?" After all the user can certainly use explode() to take it apart. I'm not against giving him that answer, it was just a quick patch to write... Is that a -1 then? > I am not so sure that adding special cases for things like mailto: > and > so on is a good idea. The code works identically to how it worked in > 4.2.3 and prior. > > Ilia > > On November 27, 2002 04:19 pm, Sara "Pollita" Golemon wrote: >> While waiting for opinions on Bug#20460 I went ahead and addressed >> #20308. >> >> User complains that parse_url returns the full email address in 'path' >> element. Makes reference to documents which claim it should return >> 'user' and 'host' element. >> >> To address this request and maintain backward compatability I wrote a >> patch to split the 'path' element in to 'host' and 'user' >> elements >> then return all three. >> >> Ex: >> *current behavior* >> print_r(parse_url("mailto:pollita@php.net")); >> Array ( >> [scheme] => mailto >> [path] => pollita@php.net >> } >> >> *new behavior* >> print_r(parse_url("mailto:pollita@php.net")); >> Array ( >> [scheme] => mailto >> [path] => pollita@php.net >> [user] => pollita >> [host] => php.net >> } >> >> If there are no objections I'll commit this change. >> >> >>